Picture of Center for Cognitive Health

Center for Cognitive Health

Cognitive Resilience: Developmental Vs. Genetic Factors

       A recent discovery of a genetically unique family has shown that developmental disorders may predispose or change the presentation of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia. The family studied consisted of 10 siblings, 8 of whom presented with developmental language problems and 1 with a sub-syndrome of frontotemporal dementia known as logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA). All members had average total brain volumes but decreased left cortical volume, and reduced functional connectivity between the left superior temporal cortex (responsible for auditory processing) and language areas in both hemispheres resulting in the language dysfunction.

       The researchers hypothesized that developmental delays in language and changes in brain morphology may induce AD symptomology effectively matching that of lvPPA. Due to the pre-existing changes and vulnerability of the language network, these networks are first to dysfunction. In those without developmental language delays, AD selectively affects executive functioning first. This contrasting pathology shows that pre-existing conditions and morphological changes in the brain might interact to change or accelerate the development of other disorders.

       If pre-existing dysfunctional networks contribute to the development of AD, it’s possible hyper-functional networks may be neuroprotective. To assess this theory elderly participants received biennial amyloid PET scans and underwent yearly cognitive testing for 14 years. The presence of the APOE-2 gene, lower pulse pressure, and higher baseline scores on cognitive tests appeared to be neuroprotective. Engagement in paid work and increased life satisfaction also predicted resilience to cognitive decline, but to a lesser degree. Furthermore, in amyloid-positive participants, never having smoked also predicted cognitive resilience.

       While the APOE-2 genotype is neuroprotective via reduced likelihood of amyloid build-up, the relationship between pulse pressure, cognitive testing scores, and AD are in need of further study. In those who are amyloid positive, higher baseline cognitive scores and never having smoked predicted increased cognitive resilience. This suggests that networks with greater functional connectivity (in comparison to the family with language deficits who had decreased connectivity) are indeed able to remain cognitively normal for longer. Additionally, cerebral vasculature appears to play an important role in cognitive resilience, with those with lower pulse pressure remaining cognitively normal for longer. On top of this, smoking increases blood pressure further supporting the concept that those who never smoked were also more cognitively resilient.

       Genetics are only one factor in the multifaceted disorder that is AD. Presence of amyloid does not guarantee AD pathology, AD pathology may present differently in a brain with morphological and functional changes induced by other genes, and non-genetic factors such as smoking and lifestyle also play a role. Researchers are now tasked with finding the intersection of genetics, lifestyle, and comorbid disorders to determine how these things influence AD and from there, how to counteract cognitive decline or even prevent it in the first place!

Hillis, A. E. & Kolundžić, Z. Developmental and degenerative deficiencies in the language network [Internet]. Neurology. 2020. Available from: https://n.neurology.org/content/95/7/281
Snitz, B. E. et al. Predicting resistance to amyloid-beta deposition and cognitive resilience in the oldest-old [Internet]. Neurology. 2020. Available from: https://n.neurology.org/content/95/8/e984